CO129-310 - Acting Governor Major Gen Gascoigne - 1902 [1-4] — Page 478

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

that I could not reconsider the decision that the proposed expenditure on public works must be

at least

Stake

reduced by $200,000. Some offertents of that I had

saging

The necessit for

bar reduct

intended to embestyrefly in a desfalch einefly Gy desk.

to your confidentit desfatch of 17 Janney (which need no

be regarded as

layer

confidential.)

but that the matter

wan

accidentall aulicked. If I take this offortunity of

saying

that I am by

satisfied

tw me any

with the

action taken

ad the wrift of

telegram of the 12th

Cherefore

do regard

December, by

the

474

So officers

are

who

members of the Public Works Committee

nal of Hytters

niche de

the list

of my Public Works Each a ordinary

et

bodily be reported, or the Committer argued to of

regarded

an works

fuming merity

In my opinion the resolution adoptic

cercumstances bhare

received a support

from

by

the Committee

should not have been ought

get not, und fe

they official ut officers

for Your

a

Why Committee A

to six

the Chamian ought

When und to

Sin

any way.

I have

8. The asked the C.A. fu the Colomes totake

stity for the relation

Overson for

an

After re-examining the text and following the instructions:

I am to inform you that I could not reconsider the decision that the proposed expenditure on public works must be at least reduced by $200,000. Some observations of that I had suggesting the necessity for such reduction were intended to be embodied briefly in a despatch lying on my desk.

Referring to your confidential despatch of 17 January (which need not be regarded as confidential any longer) I may say that the matter was accidentally overlooked. If I take this opportunity of saying that I am satisfied with the action taken and the wording of the telegram of the 12th December, by the Governor, I do so because 474 officers are members of the Public Works Committee.

As for the list of my Public Works, each ordinary item bodily be reported, or the Committee argued to be regarded as works furnishing merit.

In my opinion, the resolution adopted under the circumstances there received a support from the Committee, and should not have been brought forward by official members of the Committee in any way.

I have asked the Colonial Accountant for the Colonies to take steps for the revision of Overson for an...

Here is the corrected version in HTML format:

I am to inform you that I could not reconsider the decision that the proposed expenditure on public works must be at least reduced by $200,000. Some observations of that I had suggesting the necessity for such reduction were intended to be embodied briefly in a despatch lying on my desk.

Referring to your confidential despatch of 17 January (which need not be regarded as confidential any longer) I may say that the matter was accidentally overlooked. If I take this opportunity of saying that I am satisfied with the action taken and the wording of the telegram of the 12th December, by the Governor, I do so because some officers are members of the Public Works Committee.

As for the list of my Public Works, each ordinary item should be reported, or the Committee argued that it should be regarded as works of merit.

In my opinion, the resolution adopted under the circumstances should not have been brought forward by official members of the Committee in any way.

I have asked the Colonial Accountant for the Colonies to take steps for the revision of Overson for an...

Edit History

2026-06-01 08:23:05 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
that I could not reconsider the decision that the proposed expenditure on public works must be at least Stake reduced by $200,000. Some offertents of that I had saging The necessit for bar reduct intended to embestyrefly in a desfalch einefly Gy desk. to your confidentit desfatch of 17 Janney (which need no be regarded as layer confidential.) but that the matter wan accidentall aulicked. If I take this offortunity of saying that I am by satisfied tw me any with the action taken ad the wrift of telegram of the 12th Cherefore do regard December, by the 474 So officers are who members of the Public Works Committee nal of Hytters niche de the list of my Public Works Each a ordinary et bodily be reported, or the Committer argued to of regarded an works fuming merity In my opinion the resolution adoptic cercumstances bhare received a support from by the Committee should not have been ought get not, und fe they official ut officers for Your a Why Committee A to six the Chamian ought When und to Sin any way. I have 8. The asked the C.A. fu the Colomes totake stity for the relation Overson for an After re-examining the text and following the instructions: I am to inform you that I could not reconsider the decision that the proposed expenditure on public works must be at least reduced by $200,000. Some observations of that I had suggesting the necessity for such reduction were intended to be embodied briefly in a despatch lying on my desk. Referring to your confidential despatch of 17 January (which need not be regarded as confidential any longer) I may say that the matter was accidentally overlooked. If I take this opportunity of saying that I am satisfied with the action taken and the wording of the telegram of the 12th December, by the Governor, I do so because 474 officers are members of the Public Works Committee. As for the list of my Public Works, each ordinary item bodily be reported, or the Committee argued to be regarded as works furnishing merit. In my opinion, the resolution adopted under the circumstances there received a support from the Committee, and should not have been brought forward by official members of the Committee in any way. I have asked the Colonial Accountant for the Colonies to take steps for the revision of Overson for an... Here is the corrected version in HTML format: I am to inform you that I could not reconsider the decision that the proposed expenditure on public works must be at least reduced by $200,000. Some observations of that I had suggesting the necessity for such reduction were intended to be embodied briefly in a despatch lying on my desk. Referring to your confidential despatch of 17 January (which need not be regarded as confidential any longer) I may say that the matter was accidentally overlooked. If I take this opportunity of saying that I am satisfied with the action taken and the wording of the telegram of the 12th December, by the Governor, I do so because some officers are members of the Public Works Committee. As for the list of my Public Works, each ordinary item should be reported, or the Committee argued that it should be regarded as works of merit. In my opinion, the resolution adopted under the circumstances should not have been brought forward by official members of the Committee in any way. I have asked the Colonial Accountant for the Colonies to take steps for the revision of Overson for an...
Baseline (Original)
You that I could not reconsider the decision that the proposed expenditure on public works must be at bast Stake reduced by $200,000. S Anis offertents of that I had saging The necessit for bar reduct intended to embestyrefly in a desfalch einefly Gy desk. to your confidentit desfatch of 17 Janney (which need no be regarded as layer confidential.) but that the matter wan accidentall aulicked. If Fake this offortunity of saying that Jam by satisfied tw me any with the action taken ad the wrift of telegram of the 12th Cherefore do regard December, by the 474 So officers are who members of the Public Works Committee nal of Hytters niche de the list of my Public Works Each a ordinary མཐོན་ et bodily be reported, or the Committer argued to of regarded an works fuming merity ペイ In my opinion the resolution adoptic cercumstances bhare received a support from by the Committee should not have been ought get not, und fe they official ut officers for Your a Why Committee A to six the Chamian ought When und to Sin any way. I have 8. The asked the C.A. fu the Colomes totake stity for the relation Overson for an I
2026-06-01 08:23:05 · Baseline
View content

You

that I could not reconsider the decision that the proposed expenditure on public works must be

at bast

Stake

reduced by $200,000. S Anis offertents of that I had

saging

The necessit for

bar reduct

intended to embestyrefly in a desfalch einefly Gy desk.

to your confidentit desfatch of 17 Janney (which need no

be regarded as

layer

confidential.)

but that the matter

wan

accidentall aulicked. If Fake this offortunity of

saying

that Jam by

satisfied

tw me any

with the

action taken

ad the wrift of

telegram of the 12th

Cherefore

do regard

December, by

the

474

So officers

are

who

members of the Public Works Committee

nal of Hytters

niche de

the list

of my Public Works Each a ordinary

མཐོན་

et

bodily be reported, or the Committer argued to of

regarded

an works

fuming merity

ペイ

In my opinion the resolution adoptic

cercumstances bhare

received a support

from

by

the Committee

should not have been ought

get not, und fe

they official ut officers

for Your

a

Why Committee A

to six

the Chamian ought

When und to

Sin

any way.

I have

8. The asked the C.A. fu the Colomes totake

stity for the relation

Overson for

an

I

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.